About the Site Email Newsletter Links to Cycling Organisations
Bicycle and Public Transport Bicycle Network Planning Bicycle Strategies & Plans Bike Share Programs Cycling Data End of Trip Facilities Facility Design / Engineering Land Use Planning Mobility Management
Cycling Skills: Information for Riders Cycling Skills: Programs and Resources Organisations Professional Development Research
Awards and Recognition Behaviour Change Programs Economic Benefits of Cycling Environmental Benefits of Cycling Health Benefits of Cycling Maps Marketing Ride to School Ride to Shops Ride to Work Social Benefits of Cycling Women in Cycling
Bicycle Regulations Overviews Solutions Statistics & Common Crashes
Cycle Tourism: Promotion Cycle Tourism: Strategies Organisations Recreation: BMX Facilities Recreation: Off Road Facilities and Trails Recreation: Publications and Resources Recreation: Strategies Recreation: Trail and Facility Design Research
International Local Government National Government State & Territory Government
Cycling Innovations Encouragement & Promotion Enforcement & Road Safety Engineering & Planning Funding

Search

Font Decrease Font Normal Font Increase Print

Evaluation of Shared Lane Markings in Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA)

This research report was published in the journal Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board in December 2011. Shared lane markings (sharrows) convey the message that motorists and cyclists must share the travel way on which they are operating.Overall, safety effects appeared to be associated with the installation of the sharrows placed 10 ft (3.05 m) from the curb. 

Shared lane markings (sharrows) convey the message that motorists and cyclists must share the travel way on which they are operating. The purpose of the markings is to create improved conditions for bicycling by clarifying where cyclists are expected to ride and reminding motorists to expect cyclists on the road. A before-after evaluation was conducted to compare how cyclists and motorists operated on a street with parallel parking in Cambridge, Massachusetts, with no markings versus with sharrows placed 10 ft (3.05 m) from the curb. This evaluation, which was part of a broader FHWA study on sharrows, was intended to help determine whether an alternative to the 11-ft (3.4-m) spacing recommended in the 2009 version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices would be effective. Operational and safety measures for bicyclists and motorists were examined. Overall, safety effects appeared to be associated with the installation of the sharrows placed 10 ft (3.05 m) from the curb. Perhaps the most important effect was the 14-in. (36-cm) increase in spacing between motor vehicles in the travel lane and parked motor vehicles when no bicycles were present. This effect increased the operating space for bicyclists. Many variables related to the interaction of bicycles and motor vehicles also showed positive operational and safety effects.

Read More